G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 112 Non Members

Comments

  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    i've just done numbers for its race last saturday, and all i'm going to say is....... :shock: :shock:
  • H-BOMBERH-BOMBER    10,567 posts
    Hey Carey, interested to hear what you mean by doing the numbers? Im intrigued :?:
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    Hey Carey, interested to hear what you mean by doing the numbers? Im intrigued :?:


    well, i suppose it's hard to explain and i don't intend to properly, but if you gamble, you need ways of ranking the horses.

    one of those ways is using section times and race times.

    the thing about barakey is that it is making the race(and going like hell in front, even if it does not look like it), so it should be wilting a bit at least at the end.....instead it's winning untouched(although it's questionable how much extra he could find if pressured)

    from a punting aspect these are the VERY best types of horse, because they don't rely on others to make the race for them.

    so unless something goes wrong with the horse, then i can't see it getting beaten on its merits in wa, although i guess they all get beaten sooner or later.

    anyway the numbers i am producing for it(and i must stress that subjectivity plays no part in the raw numbers), are basically out of this world!!

    still, if it makes it over east i don't know, as what it has to do in wa will not be the same as it has to do over here(if it comes).
    but so long as it doesn't bump into bc then i am pretty confident it will measure up to the best of the rest over here.

    i shouldn't be surprised though as i noted early on in this thread it was VERY good.
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,990 posts
    said:

    said:

    Hey Carey, interested to hear what you mean by doing the numbers? Im intrigued :?:


    well, i suppose it's hard to explain and i don't intend to properly, but if you gamble, you need ways of ranking the horses.

    one of those ways is using section times and race times.

    the thing about barakey is that it is making the race(and going like hell in front, even if it does not look like it), so it should be wilting a bit at least at the end.....instead it's winning untouched(although it's questionable how much extra he could find if pressured)

    from a punting aspect these are the VERY best types of horse, because they don't rely on others to make the race for them.

    so unless something goes wrong with the horse, then i can't see it getting beaten on its merits in wa, although i guess they all get beaten sooner or later.

    anyway the numbers i am producing for it(and i must stress that subjectivity plays no part in the raw numbers), are basically out of this world!!

    still, if it makes it over east i don't know, as what it has to do in wa will not be the same as it has to do over here(if it comes).
    but so long as it doesn't bump into bc then i am pretty confident it will measure up to the best of the rest over here.

    i shouldn't be surprised though as i noted early on in this thread it was VERY good.
    Barakey will improve on those numbers as he was perhaps 3 lengths off his top, maybe more. He has more scope than many horses seen here in recent years and destined for the highest level of success in the Spring.
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    said:

    said:

    Hey Carey, interested to hear what you mean by doing the numbers? Im intrigued :?:


    well, i suppose it's hard to explain and i don't intend to properly, but if you gamble, you need ways of ranking the horses.

    one of those ways is using section times and race times.

    the thing about barakey is that it is making the race(and going like hell in front, even if it does not look like it), so it should be wilting a bit at least at the end.....instead it's winning untouched(although it's questionable how much extra he could find if pressured)

    from a punting aspect these are the VERY best types of horse, because they don't rely on others to make the race for them.

    so unless something goes wrong with the horse, then i can't see it getting beaten on its merits in wa, although i guess they all get beaten sooner or later.

    anyway the numbers i am producing for it(and i must stress that subjectivity plays no part in the raw numbers), are basically out of this world!!

    still, if it makes it over east i don't know, as what it has to do in wa will not be the same as it has to do over here(if it comes).
    but so long as it doesn't bump into bc then i am pretty confident it will measure up to the best of the rest over here.

    i shouldn't be surprised though as i noted early on in this thread it was VERY good.
    Barakey will improve on those numbers as he was perhaps 3 lengths off his top, maybe more. He has more scope than many horses seen here in recent years and destined for the highest level of success in the Spring.
    Agree but Jimmy is a master at planning so if he dodges BC they will collect $$$ no point running into her Hay List did that for 2 years imagine the $$ they could have won if the owners dropped the ego trip what was it that Davenport said [WE WILL BE THE ONLY HORSE TO BEAT HER ???] Not anymore old chap
  • said:

    said:

    said:

    Hey Carey, interested to hear what you mean by doing the numbers? Im intrigued :?:


    well, i suppose it's hard to explain and i don't intend to properly, but if you gamble, you need ways of ranking the horses.

    one of those ways is using section times and race times.

    the thing about barakey is that it is making the race(and going like hell in front, even if it does not look like it), so it should be wilting a bit at least at the end.....instead it's winning untouched(although it's questionable how much extra he could find if pressured)

    from a punting aspect these are the VERY best types of horse, because they don't rely on others to make the race for them.

    so unless something goes wrong with the horse, then i can't see it getting beaten on its merits in wa, although i guess they all get beaten sooner or later.

    anyway the numbers i am producing for it(and i must stress that subjectivity plays no part in the raw numbers), are basically out of this world!!

    still, if it makes it over east i don't know, as what it has to do in wa will not be the same as it has to do over here(if it comes).
    but so long as it doesn't bump into bc then i am pretty confident it will measure up to the best of the rest over here.

    i shouldn't be surprised though as i noted early on in this thread it was VERY good.
    Barakey will improve on those numbers as he was perhaps 3 lengths off his top, maybe more. He has more scope than many horses seen here in recent years and destined for the highest level of success in the Spring.
    He will want to have more than 3 lengths improvement if he is going to be winning in Melb springtime
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,990 posts
    It will be nice to watch either way. I have said to anyone who would listen in the last 6 months, that I believe Barakey to be the only horse in Australia that can perhaps one day knock over Black Caviar.
  • DarkDark    909 posts
    As mentioned before Carey my data isn't up to date due to other projects so I havent got his latest run in my database, but to put into perspective against HAY LIST, after 6 starts, I had BARAKEY at 141 and HAY LIST at 137.

    The peak rating I have for HL in WA is 143 in his second last start against my namesake 8)

    What those numbers actually mean to joe punter are irrelevant, but how do your numbers for the 2 compare Carey?
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    It will be nice to watch either way. I have said to anyone who would listen in the last 6 months, that I believe Barakey to be the only horse in Australia that can perhaps one day knock over Black Caviar.

    Thats what Davenport said also
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,990 posts
    said:

    said:

    It will be nice to watch either way. I have said to anyone who would listen in the last 6 months, that I believe Barakey to be the only horse in Australia that can perhaps one day knock over Black Caviar.

    Thats what Davenport said also
    So I take it you are not that optimistic ?
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    said:

    said:

    It will be nice to watch either way. I have said to anyone who would listen in the last 6 months, that I believe Barakey to be the only horse in Australia that can perhaps one day knock over Black Caviar.

    Thats what Davenport said also
    So I take it you are not that optimistic ?
    No mate
  • said:

    It will be nice to watch either way. I have said to anyone who would listen in the last 6 months, that I believe Barakey to be the only horse in Australia that can perhaps one day knock over Black Caviar.[/quote


    your in Disneyland

  • PrecisionPrecision    295 posts
    What I don't get though is if he's as good as everyone thinks what's he doing running here for peanuts compared to what's on offer over east? Everyone says Jimmy's the master of keeping their rating down but if he's good enough to win the big races now then why wait? all horses have a limited time they can compete so if you have a champion you want to be running for the big money as much as you can. if he doesn't measure up then you can always come back your rating wont change for runnimg down the track.

    classic line came when BC was talking about coming for the winterbottom. Jimmy said he'd avoid her because imagine the rating they'd get if he beat her.......news flash, if you're good enough to beat her you don't have to worry about your rating no more. just win every wfa sprint this country has...


    .
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,990 posts
    Barakey will win the Northam Stakes, then the Bolton Sprint. Then a short let up. This much Jim has publicly said when interviewed with Wes Cameron after Saturday's win. I think the horse will be rated above 100 by then, and the East will beckon.

    Go to Melbourne for the Spring Carnival riches and come home and plunder the Winterbottom Stakes.

    Yep I'm dreaming of course.
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    What I don't get though is if he's as good as everyone thinks what's he doing running here for peanuts compared to what's on offer over east? Everyone says Jimmy's the master of keeping their rating down but if he's good enough to win the big races now then why wait? all horses have a limited time they can compete so if you have a champion you want to be running for the big money as much as you can. if he doesn't measure up then you can always come back your rating wont change for runnimg down the track.

    classic line came when BC was talking about coming for the winterbottom. Jimmy said he'd avoid her because imagine the rating they'd get if he beat her.......news flash, if you're good enough to beat her you don't have to worry about your rating no more. just win every wfa sprint this country has...


    .

    When i said that Precision i got screamed down i agree he has one that is a superstar and could win anywere so all the games about beating the ratings ect ect win races and $$$$ thats the objective pretty simple they can go amiss very easy and then you have to ponder what might have been did the same with Haylist and he wasnt the soundess horse going around with his feet so running in shitty races just sent him to the paddock quicker money in the bank wins all the time !!!!.
    He weill win east on times no prob but getting close to the champ just wont happen its as simple as that ,there are a few ok sprinters over east at present Rain Affair ,Bel Sprinter,Foxwedge ect ect he has to beat them before i consider him a chance against the best in the world BC
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    As mentioned before Carey my data isn't up to date due to other projects so I havent got his latest run in my database, but to put into perspective against HAY LIST, after 6 starts, I had BARAKEY at 141 and HAY LIST at 137.

    The peak rating I have for HL in WA is 143 in his second last start against my namesake 8)

    What those numbers actually mean to joe punter are irrelevant, but how do your numbers for the 2 compare Carey?

    my best for barakey in wa is a bit higher than my best for hay list in wa.

    hay list over east would be higher than hay list in wa, but i don't personally keep numbers for anywhere but wa, and i don't talk about stuff that is not entirely my own, and i can't check it off this computer anyway!

    the problem with wa horses is they don't have to run to the required level when they are in wa, so it's always difficult to tell what will happen when they go east......can they raise to that level or not?
    in the case of barakey, if i was a betting man :lol: , then i would say yes, it's easily up to the best over here with one notable exception.

    still, they're only numbers, and are often wrong, but i don't think that's the case with barakey, because it just keeps returning mammoth numbers every time.
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    What I don't get though is if he's as good as everyone thinks what's he doing running here for peanuts compared to what's on offer over east? Everyone says Jimmy's the master of keeping their rating down but if he's good enough to win the big races now then why wait? all horses have a limited time they can compete so if you have a champion you want to be running for the big money as much as you can. if he doesn't measure up then you can always come back your rating wont change for runnimg down the track.

    classic line came when BC was talking about coming for the winterbottom. Jimmy said he'd avoid her because imagine the rating they'd get if he beat her.......news flash, if you're good enough to beat her you don't have to worry about your rating no more. just win every wfa sprint this country has...


    .


    the ratings mean diddly squat if there is a maximum topweight, or the race is wfa.
    bc rating is basically staying stagnant because she keeps meeting the opposition on favourable weight terms, and thus can't logically have her rating increased.
  • auzzieauzzie    92 posts
    From memory the owners knocked bak big offers so. Not that big of a deal the thrill is better and Jimmy is a master of pickn up easy money so it's just all good.. wen he gets to take the better ones on he be mature and ready super horse. Super trainer
  • JasonPolettiJasonPoletti    21 posts
    said:

    From memory the owners knocked bak big offers so. Not that big of a deal the thrill is better and Jimmy is a master of pickn up easy money so it's just all good.. wen he gets to take the better ones on he be mature and ready super horse. Super trainer

    The best short course horse in Perth.
  • auzzieauzzie    92 posts
    Totally agree hopefully he can win over east to we have known to produce the odd sprinter lol
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    Have just sat down and watched all his runs......and he is so impressive. It'll be interesting to see him against some higher quality opposition, but i have a feeling that once he does that we wont see him back here very often.

    As with Hay List, we were lucky to see him early and he was just as impressive. I wish Jimmy and the connections all the best, as a rising 5yr old with only a dozen runs under his belt (including trials) he is in a great position to challenge the best in the land this spring, and if that goes to plan maybe the best anywhere next year...

    He is impressive and i hope that when he comes up against better horses he can run all the way to the line, and the way he ran out those first few races i reckon he'll do well....

    I like the way they have worked him through his grades..Put a few dollars in his bank for the owners and that helps with what is in front of him.
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    1 little problem called BLACK CAVIAR !!!!!!
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    yeah yeah.....and i hope that he can be competitive..

    She has done it all against quality opposition...and i hope she retires never beaten in about 2 years..he doesn't have to beat her to be a great horse. :)
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    yeah yeah.....and i hope that he can be competitive..

    She has done it all against quality opposition...and i hope she retires never beaten in about 2 years..he doesn't have to beat her to be a great horse. :)

    Yes he does as he has beaten dead set nothing over here he hasnt even ran in a listed race ,but times dont lie Rio i would just love to see him against the top end sprinters to get a gauge on him ,Rain Affair,Ortensia,Foxwedge ect etc but cant deny he is a special animal probably Key Businesses best and at a late stage of his breeding life to he is a credit to the local breeding industry year in year out always has a good horse
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    Maybe he does...but i dont reckon he does. Then again maybe i shouldn't have used the word GREAT..cos i reckon Hay List is a great horse but he hasn't beaten Black Caviar.

    I still feel that to beat her, he would have to be a champion. And until he goes up against some class horses it is hard to put any label on him. His times are sensational and i want to see him run out the whole race...Only against the better horses will he have to do that.

    Now he is in the 90's(although it is a WA 90!!!!!) we are all close to seeing exactly what he is made of...Will be an interesting spring.

    Have missed out on a few Key Business yearlings..agree that he has been a worthy stallion and occassionally under rated.
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    Maybe he does...but i dont reckon he does. Then again maybe i shouldn't have used the word GREAT..cos i reckon Hay List is a great horse but he hasn't beaten Black Caviar.

    I still feel that to beat her, he would have to be a champion. And until he goes up against some class horses it is hard to put any label on him. His times are sensational and i want to see him run out the whole race...Only against the better horses will he have to do that.

    Now he is in the 90's(although it is a WA 90!!!!!) we are all close to seeing exactly what he is made of...Will be an interesting spring.

    Have missed out on a few Key Business yearlings..agree that he has been a worthy stallion and occassionally under rated.

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    never mind rio, he may only be a 'wa90' at the moment, but he is much much better than that i reckon.
  • DarkDark    909 posts
    Curiosity got the better of me and i updated my data.... I have his last run 1 point worse than the run before :?
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    Curiosity got the better of me and i updated my data.... I have his last run 1 point worse than the run before :?

    it's not his best run for me either.
    5/11 was a fair bit better, but every run it does is VERY high.
    there's also the essence of the runs.
    high numbers alone don't necessarily mean much
  • TheDivaTheDiva    13,248 posts
    said:

    said:

    Curiosity got the better of me and i updated my data.... I have his last run 1 point worse than the run before :?

    it's not his best run for me either.
    5/11 was a fair bit better, but every run it does is VERY high.
    there's also the essence of the runs.
    high numbers alone don't necessarily mean much
    its the vibe......... :lol:
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,990 posts
    Barakey runs again this Sunday at Northam for the Listed Northam Toyota Stakes over 1100M. The Northam Race Club have thrown open the gates as well, with attractions for the family & kids on course.

    So if you want to see the continued rise of WA's best sprinting prospect in the last 5 years, come to Northam on Sunday.

    I might also add that this meeting is the first for My Atacanta complimentary serves for the upcoming breeding season. Any filly or mare winning on the day, and of course the winner of the "My Atacanta at Rivercrest Park for 2012 Hcp" will all pick up a serve for connections in addition to the stakes on offer.
Sign In or Register to comment.