G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 122 Non Members

Aust v Eng ODI Game 2

Sport
edited November -1 Sport
Hope Marsh goes well today

bit surprise England decided to bowl first

should be a close game again

Comments

  • Clarke is friggin hopeless - how many more failures is he allowed?
  • PrecisionPrecision    295 posts
    Clarke and D Hussey are liabilities, Marsh showing his class absolute joke he's not in the World Cup squad ahead of two blokes mentioned.
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    Steve Smith...again!

    He isn't a good enough batter or bowler yet to play international cricket, needs time to develop and our side isn't strong enough to carry him while he develops at international level.
  • this is like 1980's cricket

    hope we can defend the modest total
  • ericwanduericwandu    544 posts
    marsh you legend.

    better be opening next game.
  • quite laughable when Bollinger is one of our best batsmen :P
  • PrecisionPrecision    295 posts
    Just starting to watch on channel 9 now, wicket looks very good, be very suprised if England don't walk this in......Great stuff from Marsh though, has always been one of the best bats in the country we just need to get some selectors in who have a clue.
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    Steve Smith...again!

    He isn't a good enough batter or bowler yet to play international cricket, needs time to develop and our side isn't strong enough to carry him while he develops at international level.

    Your probably close to the mark there Occy
  • TorpedoPuntTorpedoPunt    1,891 posts
    Brett Lee still got it :P
  • Thought Bollinger should have got MOM but SOS did play well.

    Love the ODI's - always great opportunities to trade
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    Thought Bollinger should have got MOM but SOS did play well.

    Really? You would be hard pressed to find anybody who agreed with you.
  • 4 wickets (including Strauss and Peterson) and 30 runs from a number 9 were invaluable

    question is how many runs do you rate a wicket at ?

    normally a 5-for is about the same as a ton - if so they were pretty much level anyway

    and if it wasnt for Douggie then MARSH never gets his century
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    4 wickets (including Strauss and Peterson) and 30 runs from a number 9 were invaluable

    question is how many runs do you rate a wicket at ?

    normally a 5-for is about the same as a ton - if so they were pretty much level anyway

    and if it wasnt for Douggie then MARSH never gets his century

    If Marsh didnt get a century we would have lost, Bollinger was very good tonight but Marsh won us the game.
  • just proves my point

    "Marsh only gets the century because of Douggie"

    and England could have still made the runs if Douggie doesnt take 4
  • JazzHJazzH    314 posts
    yeh dougie did well but shaun's ton deserves man of the match.. what an amazing knock... i tell ya what he better be in the world cup, they better make a change to that squad :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


    hopefully the aussies can make it 3 from 3 in the ODI's!
    :lol:
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    just proves my point

    "Marsh only gets the century because of Douggie"

    and England could have still made the runs if Douggie doesnt take 4

    lol, just find me one person that agrees with you...
  • TorpedoPuntTorpedoPunt    1,891 posts
    said:
    hopefully he was given the man of the match honours to force the selectors/muppets to include him in the world cup squad.
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:
    Left myself open for that one, is there nothing you can't find on the internet?

    Either way its good to see Bollinger back, I posted the other day that going into the WC we needed him to find some form.

    Lee looks better than I gave him credit for, but gee he bowls stupidly at times...

    Tait getting injured is a blessing in disguise, shame Harris isn't fit...
Sign In or Register to comment.